Modification of the neurotic disorders questionnaire — symptom based on the Rasch metric system
Abstract
The results of assessing the psychometric properties of the modified Neurotic Disorders Questionnaire — symptomatic based on the Rasch metric system are described. The modified questionnaire contains 13 scales. Quality indices of 135 points are in the range of 0,6—1,4. The UMS and WMS quality indices of item No. 42 of the Depression Scale are 0,54 and 0,58, the UMS and WMS quality indices of item No. 7 of the Sexual Impairment Scale are 1,41 and 1,47. Reliability indices within the range of 0,70—0,92, separation indices from 1,40 to 3,47, indices of the number of layers from 3 to 5. Established statistical levels of severity of neurotic symptoms of a modified questionnaire and clinical degrees of severity according to statistical levels of severity of neurotic symptoms are proposed symptoms.
About the Authors
T. E. Tamashchyk
Гродненский государственный медицинский университет; Гродненский областной клинический кардиологический центр
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
A. A. Lugovskaya
Гродненский государственный медицинский университет; Гродненский областной клинический кардиологический центр
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
O. A. Starovoitova
Гродненский государственный медицинский университет; Гродненский областной клинический кардиологический центр
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Assanovich M. A. Clinical psychodiagnostics. Specialized methods and questionnaires: textbook. Grodno: GrSMU; 2013: 520. [(in Russian)]
2. Kaidanovskaya E. V. Study of the psychological characteristics of patients with neuroses in the process of pathogenetic psychotherapy: in connection with the tasks of studying its effectiveness. Avtoref. dis.... kand. psikhol. nauk. L. 1987; 23. [(in Russian)]
3. Ter-Baghdasaryan L. P. Study of the dynamics of clinical and psychological characteristics of patients with neuroses in the process of group psychotherapy Dis. ... kand. psikhol. nauk. L. 1990. [(in Russian)]
4. Wasserman L. I., Shchelkova O. Yu. Medical psychodiagnostics: Theory, practice and training. SPb., M.; 2004: 442—7. [(in Russian)]
5. Assanovich M. A. Methodological approaches to scientific measurement in clinical psychodiagnostics. Minsk; 2017: 224. [(in Russian)]
6. Assanovich M. A. Methodology and applied aspects of the Rush metric system in clinical psychodiagnostics: monograph. Grodno: GrSMU; 2018: 428. [(in Russian)]
7. Andrich D., Marais I. A Course in Rasch Measurement Theory. Measuring in the Educational, Social and Health Sciences. Springer; 2019: 482. doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7496-8.
8. Bond T. G., Fox C. M. Applying the Rasch model: fundamental measurement in the human sciences. NY: Routledge; 2012: 384.
9. Assanovich M. A. The method of defining cut-off criteria in clinical rating scales developed using Rasch model. Psikhiatriya i psikhofarmakoterapiya im. P. B. Gannushkina. 2017; 18(3): 19—24. [(in Russian)]
10. Wright B. D., Stone M. Measurement Essentials. Wilmington: WIDE RANGE, INC., 1999: 221.
11. Wright B. D., Linacre J. M. Reasonable mean-square fit values. Rasch Measurement transactions. 1994; 8 (3): 370.
Review
For citations:
Tamashchyk T.E., Lugovskaya A.A., Starovoitova O.A. Modification of the neurotic disorders questionnaire — symptom based on the Rasch metric system. Healthcare. 2024;(5):22-28. (In Russ.)
Views:
7
Email this article 