Parameters of ultrasound diagnosis of varicocele in the practice of a pediatric surgeon
https://doi.org/10.65249/1027-7218-2025-12-30-38
Abstract
An analysis of the available literature data shows the need to continue research in the field of diagnosis and treatment of varicocele using available modern technologies. Timely diagnosis, rational choice of management tactics and methods of surgical correction of varicocele in childhood and adolescence is an important task for medical science and practical healthcare, which have a direct impact on the demographic situation in the country.
The article is devoted to the analysis of medical literature concerning the main parameters of ultrasound examination of patients with varicocele, and the ratio of the data obtained in the clinic. This article reflects the ultrasound parameters observed in 90 patients admitted to the pediatric surgical hospital for elective surgical treatment of varicocele.
About the Authors
A. Sedlauski
Витебский государственный ордена Дружбы народов медицинский университет
Беларусь
Беларусь
Yu. Degtyarev
Белорусский государственный медицинский университет
Беларусь
Беларусь
References
1. Damsgaard J., Joensen U.N., Carlsen E., et al. Varicocele is associated with impaired semen quality and reproductive hormone levels. Eur Urol. 2016; 70(6): 1019–1029.
2. Сayan S., Bozlu M., Akbay E. Update on the novel management and future paternity situation in adolescents with varicocele. Turk J Urol. 2017; 43(3): 241–246.
3. Kumar N., Singh A.K. Singh Trends of male factor infertility, an important cause of infertility. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2015; 8(4): 191–196.
4. Alsaikhan B., Alrabeeah K., Delouya G., et al. Epidemiology of varicocele. Asian J Androl. 2016; 18(2): 179–181.
5. Marte A. The history of varicocele: from antiquity to the modern ERA. Int Braz J Urol. 2018; 44(2): 563–576.
6. Salonia A., Bettochi C., Carvalho J., et al. EAU guidelines on sexual and reproductive health 2020. Available at: https:// d56bochluxqnz.cloudfront.net/documents/EAU-Guidelines-on-Sexual-and-Reproductive-Health-2020.pdf (accessed: 10.09.2025).
7. Lotti F., Maggi M. Ultrasound of the male genital tract in relation to male reproductive health. Hum Reprod Update. 2015; 21(1): 56–83.
8. Sarteschi L.M. Valsalva maneuver and Doppler ultrasound of the pampiniform plexus: a new perspective in the diagnosis of subclinical varicocele. Fertil Steril. 2002; 77(1): 119–122.
9. Pilatz A., Altinkilic B., Kohler E., et al. Color Doppler ultrasound imaging in varicoceles: is the venous diameter sufficient for predicting clinical and subclinical varicocele? World J Urol. 2011; 29(5): 645–650.
10. Gamidov S.I., Druzhinina N.K., Shatylko T.V., et al. Technical aspects of ultrasound diagnostics of varicocele and analysis of European clinical guidelines. Eksperimental'naya i klinicheskaya urologiya. 2022; 15(3): 102–108. (in Russian)
11. Paltiel H.J., Diamond D.A., DiCanzio J., et al. Testicular volume: comparison of orchidometer and US measurements in dogs. Radiology. 2002; 222(1): 114–119.
12. Mbaeri T.U., Orakwe J.C., Nwofor A.M.E., et al. Ultrasound measurements of testicular volume: comparing the three common formulas with the true testicular volume determined by water displacement. Afric J Urol. 2013; 19(2): 69–73.
13. Schiff J.D., Li P.S., Goldstein M. Correlation of ultrasonographic and orchidometer measurements of testis volume in adults. BJUI. 2004; 93(7): 1015–1017.
14. Anyanwu L.J.C., Sowande O.A., Asaleye C.M., et al. Testicular volume: correlation of ultrasonography, orchidometer and caliper measurements in children. Afric J Urol. 2020; 26(1): 1–3.
15. Kolade-Yunusa H.O., Itanyi U.D., Achonwa C.J. Determination of a normogram for testicular volume measured by ultrasonography in a normal population boys in Abuja. OJM. 2017; 29(1–2): 56–62.
16. Diamond D.A., Zurakowski D., Bauer S.B., et al. Relationship of varicocele grade and testicular hypotrophy to semen parameters in adolescents. J Urol. 2007; 178: 1584–1588.
17. Kogan M.I., Alvin A.A., Afoko A. Varicocele: controversies and problems. Urologiya. 2009; 6: 67–72. (in Russian)
18. Sizonov V.V., Sichinava Z.A., Kravtsov Yu.A. Correlation between the degree of testicular hypotrophy and testosterone levels in the testicular vein in patients with varicocele. Eksperimental'naya i klinicheskaya urologiya. 2020; 1: 119–123.
19. Val'ova Z., Kocvara R., Sedlacek J., et al. Andrological outcome of microsurgical varicocelectomy in children and adolescents according to age and type of surgery: prospective randomised study. Eur Urol Suppl. 2017; 16(11). doi: 10.1016/S1569-9056(17)31995-4
20. Nightingale K., Palmeri M., Trahey G. Analysis of contrast in images generated with transient acoustic radiation force. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2006; 32(1): 61–72.
21. Garra B.S., Cespedes E.I., Ophir J., et al. Elastography of breast lesions: initial clinical results. Radiology. 1997; 202(1): 79–86.
22. Erdogan H., Durmaz M.S., Arslan S., et al. Shear wave elastography evaluation of testes in patients with varicocele. Ultrasound quarterly. 2020; 36(1): 64–68.
23. Fuschi A., Capone L., Abuorouq S., et al. Shear wave elastography in varicocele patients: prospective study to investigate correlation with semen parameters and histological findings. Int J Clin Pract. 2021; 75(3). doi: 10.1111/ijcp.13699.
24. Mulati Y., Li X., Maimaitiming A., et al. Is there any predictive value of testicular shear wave elastic modulus in testicular functions for varicocele patients? Andrologia. 2022; 54(5). doi: 10.1111/and.14393.
25. Fu W., Cui J., Tang S. The role of testicular stiffness derived from shear wave elastography in the assessment of spermatogenesis in men with varicocele. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2024; 14(7): 4987–4997.
26. Yuzkan S., Cilengir A.H. Shear wave elastography for assessment of testicular stiffness in patients with varicocele. J Med Ultrasound. 2022; 30(4): 277–281.
27. Awati S. M. Factors predicting early improvement in semen parameters following varicocele surgery. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 3(4): 1027–1032.
28. Clavijo R.I., Carrasquillo R., Ramasamy R. Varicoceles: prevalence and pathogenesis in adult men. Fertil Steril. 2017; 108(3): 364–369.
29. Abdel-Meguid T.A., Al-Sayyad A., Tayib A. Does varicocele repair improve male infertility? An evidence-based perspective from a randomized, controlled trial. Eur Urol. 2011; 59(3): 455–461.
30. Report on varicocele and infertility: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2014; 102(6): 1556–1560.
31. Pathak P., Chandrashekar A., Hakky T.S., et al. Varicocele management in the era of in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Asian J Androl. 2016; 18(3): 343–348.
32. Kohn T.P., Kohn J.R., Pastuszak A.W. Varicocelectomy before assisted reproductive technology: are outcomes improved? Fertil Steril. 2017; 108(3): 385–391.
33. Fiogbe M.A., Ala M.J., Biaou O., et al. Ultrasound diagnosis of varicocele in the adolescent: our experience from Benin. Afr J Paediatr Surg. 2013; 10(4): 295–298.
34. Senturk A.B., Cakiroglu B., Yaytokgil M., et al. Effect of venous reflux time on testosterone and semen parameters of infertile males after microscopic varicocelectomy. Andrologia. 2020; 52(6). doi: 10.1111/and.13583.
35. Gat Y., Bachar G.N., Zukerman Z., et al. Varicocele: a bilateral disease. Fertil Steril. 2004; 81(2): 424–429.
36. Mahdavi A., Heidari R., Khezri M., et al. Can ultrasound findings be a good predictor of sperm parameters in patients with varicocele? A cross-sectional study. Nephrourol Mon. 2016; 8(5). doi: 10.5812/numonthly.37103.
37. Verim S., Uguz S., Celikkanat S., et al. Prognostic predictors of fertility in young adult patients withvaricocele: peak retrograde flow velocity and reflux grade. J Ultrasound Med. 2016; 35(6): 1241–1250.
38. Zhang S., Li H., Du J., et al. Is it important to measure the internal spermatic vein diameter after varicocelectomy? A selfcontrolled trial. Andrologia. 2022; 54(8). doi: 10.1111/and.14484.
39. De Win G., De Neubourg D., De Wachter S., et al. Peak retrograde flow a potential objective management tool to identify young adults with varicocele 'at risk' for a high sperm DNA fragmentation. J Pediatr Urol. 2021; 17(6). doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2021.09.018.
40. Liguori G., Trombetta C., Garaffa G., et al. Color Doppler ultrasound investigation of varicocele. World J Urol. 2004; 22(5): 378–381.
41. Abolhasani Foroughi A., Dallaki M., Hosseini S., et al. Relationship of clinical and ultrasonographic grading of varicocele with semen analysis profile and testicular volume. Journal of reproduction & infertility. 2022; 23(2): 84–92.
Review
For citations:
Sedlauski A., Degtyarev Yu. Parameters of ultrasound diagnosis of varicocele in the practice of a pediatric surgeon. Healthcare. 2025;(12):30-38. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.65249/1027-7218-2025-12-30-38
Views:
23
JATS XML
Email this article 