Glycemic variability indices associated with diabetic retinopathy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus
https://doi.org/10.65249/1027-7218-2026-2-4-11
Abstract
Objective. To study short-term and long-term glycemic variability (GV) as factors associated with DR, its severity, and the progression of diabetic retinopathy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Materials and methods. A retrospective analysis was conducted of 593 patients with type 2 diabetes (419 women (70.66 %) and 174 men (29.32 %), disease duration 10 [6; 15] years) who underwent ophthalmological examination in the Laser Microsurgery Department of the City Clinical Hospital No. 10 for the period 2016-2023 was performed. DR was noted in 165 patients. The study included 428 patients without exudative-hemorrhagic manifestations. The dynamic of disease progression was monitored over a oneyear and three-year period. The GV SD, CV, MAGE, and TIR indices were calculated. Statistical data processing was performed using the Statistica 12 software package.
Results. A GV SD threshold of 0.854 and MAGE 0.967 was established to detect the presence of DR. The SD and MAGE indices were statistically significantly higher in patients with DR (1.253 [0.707; 1.893] vs 0.707 [0.283; 1.414], p = 0.021 and 1.4 [0.9; 2.3] vs 0.9 [0.4; 1.833], p = 0.021). Progression of DR in the first year of observation was associated with higher rates of short-term GV SD (3.8 [2.68; 4.9] vs 1.15 [0.71; 1.4], p = 0.045); CV (41.3 [35.37; 47.1] vs 15.71 [8.14; 16.0], p = 0.045), MAGE (4.9 [2.87; 7.0] vs 1.3 [1.0; 2.0], p = 0.045). Progression of DR in the third year of observation was associated with higher rates of long-term GV SD HbA1c (3.418 [3.042; 5.219] vs 0.202 [0.0; 0.52], p = 0.052).
Conclusion. VG was associated with the presence of DR and its progression, but cannot be used as a sole marker. Further research is needed to establish a comprehensive set of markers that is effective in assessing the risk of DR progression.
About the Authors
A. SidorovichBelarus
T. Imshenetskaya
Belarus
L. Danilova
Belarus
I. Zaborovsky
Belarus
V. Savich
Belarus
S. Radkova
Belarus
References
1. IDF diabetes atlas. 10th ed. International diabetes federation. Brussels. 2021. Available at: https://www.diabetesatlas.org (accessed: 14.11.2022).
2. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Fundus photographic risk factors for progression of diabetic retinopathy ETDRS. J VitreoRetin Dis. 1991; 9(5): 823–833.
3. Zhang Z., Lv D., You Y., et al. Assessing the importance of risk factors for diabetic retinopathy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: results from the classification and regression tree models. J Family Community Med. 2024; 31(3): 197–205.
4. Simo R., Franch-Nadal J., Vlacho B., et al. Rapid reduction of HbA1c and early worsening of Diabetic Retinopathy. Diabetes Care. 2023; 46(9): 1633–1639.
5. Blighe K., Gurudas S., Lee Y., Sivaprasad S. Diabetic retinopathy environment-wide association study (EWAS) in NHANES 2005– 2008. J Clin Med. 2020; 9: 2005–2008.
6. Acan D., Calan M., Er D., et al. The prevalence and systemic risk factors of diabetic macular edema. BMC Ophthalmol. 2018; 18. doi: 10.1186/s12886-018-0753-y.
7. Cardoso C.R.L., Leite N.C., Moram C.B.M., Salles G.F. Long-term visit-to-visit glycemic variability as predictor of micro- and macrovascular complications in patients with type 2 diabetes. Cardiovascular. Diabetol. 2018; 17. doi: 10.1186/s12933-018-0677-0.
8. Lazar S., Ionita I., Reurean-Pintilei D., Timar B. How to Measure Glycemic Variability? Medicina. 2024; 60(1). doi: 10.3390/medicina60010061.
9. Porta M., Kohner E.M. Screening for diabetic retinopathy in Europe. Diabetic Medicine. 1991; 8: 197–198.
10. Dehghani Firouzabadi F., Poopak A., Samimi S., et al. Glycemic profile variability as an independent predictor of diabetic retinopathy in patients with type 2 diabetes. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024; 7(15). doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1383345.
11. Zhou J.J., Koska J., Bahn G., Reaven P. Fasting glucose variation predicts microvascular risk in ACCORD and VADT. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2021; 106(4): 1150–1162.
12. Today study group. Long-term outcomes among young adults with type 2 diabetes based on durability of glycemic control. Diabetes care. 2022; 45(11): 2689–2697.
13. Lu J., Ma X., Zhang L., et al. Glycemic variability assessed by continuous glucose monitoring and the risk of diabetic retinopathy in latent autoimmune diabetes of the adult and type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Invest. 2019; 10(3): 753–759.
14. El A., Van Elsen M., Charleer S., et al. Relationship between Time in Range, Glycemic Variability, HbA1c, and complications in adults with type 1 diabetes Mellitus. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2022; 107(2): 570–581.
15. Slieker R.C., H van der Heijden A. A. W. H., Nijpels G., et al. Visit-to-visit variability of glycemia and vascular complications. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2019; 18. doi: 10.1186/s12933-019-0975-1.
16. Hsieh Y.T., Hsieh M.C. Fasting plasma glucose variability is an independent risk factor for diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema in type 2 diabetes. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2020; 48(4): 470–476.
17. Dhatariya K., Humberstone A., Hasnat A., et al. The Association between Mean glycated haemoglobin or glycaemic variability and the development of retinopathy in people with diabetes. Diabetes Therapy. 2021; 12(10): 2755–2766.
18. Dai D., Shen Y., Lu J., et al. Association between visit-to-visit variability of glycated albumin and diabetic retinopathy among patients with type 2 diabetes. J Diabetes Complicat. 2021; 35(9). doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2021.107971.
19. Kim H.U., Park S., Kim Y.K. Long-term HbA1c variability and the development and progression of diabetic retinopathy in subjects with type 2 diabetes. Sci Rep. 2021; 11. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-84150-8.
20. Danne T., Nimri R., Battelino T., et al. International Consensus on Use of continuous glucose monitoring. Diabetes Care. 2017; 40(12): 1631–1640.
21. Mo Y., Ma X., Lu J., et al. Defining the target value of the coefficient of variation by continuous glucose monitoring in Chinese people with diabetes. J Diabetes Invest. 2021; 12(6): 1025–1034.
22. Monnier L., Colette C., Owens D.R. Glycemic variability: the third component of the dysglycemia in diabetes. Is it important? How to measure it? J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2008; 2 (6): 1094–1100.
23. Wang Y., Lu J., Shen Y., et al. Comparison of glucose time in range and area under curve in range in relation to risk of diabetic retinopathy in type 2 diabetes patients. J Diabetes Investig. 2022; 13(9); 1543–1550.
24. Rosa L., Zajdenverg L., Lopes Souto D., et al. HbA1c variability and long-term glycemic control are linked to diabetic retinopathy and glomerular filtration rate in patients with type 1 diabetes and multiethnic background. J Diabetes Complicat. 2019; 33(9): 610–615.
25. Mao Y., Zhong W. HbA1c variability as an independent risk factor for microvascular complications in type 1 diabetes. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2024; 18(2): 380–388.
26. Park J.Y., Hwang J.H., Kang M.J., et al. Effects of glycemic variability on the progression of diabetic retinopathy among patients with type 2 diabetes. Retina. 2021; 41(7): 1487–1495.
Review
For citations:
Sidorovich A., Imshenetskaya T., Danilova L., Zaborovsky I., Savich V., Radkova S. Glycemic variability indices associated with diabetic retinopathy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Healthcare. 2026;(2):4-11. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.65249/1027-7218-2026-2-4-11
JATS XML
