Preview

Healthcare

Advanced search

Prevalence and antibiotic resistance of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia in the Republic of Belarus in 2020–2024

https://doi.org/10.65249/1027-7218-2026-6-38-43

Abstract

Objective. To assess the prevalence and antibiotic resistance of S. maltophilia in Belarus over a five – year period (2020–2024).
Materials and methods. A retrospective analysis of microbiological surveillance data (WHONET) was performed on clinical S. maltophilia isolates obtained from patients in six regions of Belarus and Minsk city. A total of 3267 isolates were included. Antimicrobial susceptibility was determined by disk diffusion or automated systems and interpreted according to CLSI criteria. Statistical analysis included calculation of 95 % confidence intervals (Clopper – Pearson method), comparison of proportions and trend assessment.
Results. The largest numbers of isolates were recovered from Minsk city (56.1 %), Minsk region (13.3 %), Mogilev region (13.0 %) and Gomel region (8.2 %). Resistance to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole was 32.5 % (95 % CI (30.6–34.3 %)), susceptibility – 48.9 %. Sharp interregional differences were observed: resistance ranged from 7.4 % in Mogilev region to 95.7 % in Grodno region. Susceptibility to levofloxacin was high (81.7 %), with a trend of decreasing resistance from 24.7 % in 2021 to 5.7 % in 2024 (p < 0.001). High resistance rates to ceftazidime (80.1 %) and ticarcillin/clavulanate (24.6 %) confirmed intrinsic β-lactamase-mediated resistance. According to preliminary data (n = 43), minocycline showed high activity (88.4 % of susceptible isolates).
Conclusion. Significant interregional differences in S. maltophilia resistance to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and fluoroquinolones were found in Belarus. A marked positive trend of restoration of susceptibility to levofloxacin was observed. These findings support the need for continuous epidemiological surveillance and a region tailored approach to empirical therapy of S. maltophilia infections.

About the Authors

O. Yanovich
Республиканский центр гигиены, эпидемиологии и общественного здоровья
Belarus


E. Karpova
Институт физиологии Национальной академии наук Беларуси
Belarus


N. Levshina
Минский городской центр гигиены и эпидемиологии
Belarus


A. Kartaeva
Республиканский центр гигиены, эпидемиологии и общественного здоровья
Belarus


A. Khursan
Институт физиологии Национальной академии наук Беларуси
Belarus


D. Tapalski
Институт физиологии Национальной академии наук Беларуси
Belarus


References

1. Brooke J.S. Advances in the microbiology of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2021; 34(3). doi: 10.1128/CMR.00030-19.

2. AlFonaisan M.K., Mubaraki M.A., Althawadi S.I., et al. Temporal analysis of prevalence and antibiotic-resistance patterns of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia clinical isolates. Sci Rep. 2024; 14. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-65509-z.

3. Mojica M.F., Humphries R., Lipuma J., et al. Clinical challenges treating Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infections: an update. JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2022; 4(3). doi: 10.1093/jacamr/dlac040.

4. Sanchez M.B., Martinez J.L. The efflux pump SmeDEF contributes to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole resistance in Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015; 59(7): 4347–4348.

5. Banar M., Sattari-Maraji A., Bayatinejad G., et al. Global prevalence and antibiotic resistance in clinical isolates of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Front Med. 2023; 10. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1163439.

6. Lee Y., Liu C., Ko W.C., Hsueh P.-R. In vitro susceptibilities of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia isolates to antimicrobial agents commonly used for related infections: results from the Antimicrobial Testing Leadership and Surveillance (ATLAS) program, 2004–2020. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2023; 62(2). doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2023.106878.

7. Sader H.S., Castanheira M., Ryan Arends S.J., et al. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia from United States medical centers (2019–2023). Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2025; 69(4). doi: 10.1128/aac.00124-25.

8. Tapal'skij D.V., Karpova E.V., Bondа N.A., et al. Antibiotic susceptibility of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia and their combinations. Klinicheskaya infektologiya i harazitologiya. 2024; 13(3): 280–289. (in Russian)

9. Hirsch E.B., Alby K., Bryson A.L., Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Updates to susceptibility breakpoints for Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. CLSI Insights Blog. 2025; 10(1). Available at: https://clsi.org/resources/insights-blog/updates-to-susceptibilitybreakpoints-for-stenotrophomonas-maltophilia/ (accessed: 26.05.2026).

10. Khan S.M., Vazquez Deida A.A., Langerman S., et al. Stenotrophomonas maltophilia bloodstream infection outbreak in acute care hospital, California, USA, 2022–2023. Emerg Infect Dis. 2026; 32(3): 315–323.

11. Chung H., Kim K., Hong S.S., et al. The sul1 gene in Stenotrophomonas maltophilia with high-level resistance to trimethoprim/ sulfamethoxazole. Ann Lab Med. 2015; 35(2): 246–249.

12. Erdiren N., Atik T.K. Retrospective analysis of antibiotic resistance profiles and frequency of resistance genes in clinical Stenotrophomonas maltophilia isolates. Acta Microbiol Immunol Hung. 2025; 72(2): 139–144.


Review

For citations:


Yanovich O., Karpova E., Levshina N., Kartaeva A., Khursan A., Tapalski D. Prevalence and antibiotic resistance of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia in the Republic of Belarus in 2020–2024. Healthcare. 2026;(6):38-43. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.65249/1027-7218-2026-6-38-43

Views: 150

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1027-7218 (Print)